PPA vs green loan — UK commercial solar 2026
PPA and green loan are the two most common alternatives to capital purchase for UK commercial solar. They differ fundamentally — green loan keeps you as owner with debt to repay, PPA makes the developer the owner with you as electricity offtaker. Both deliver "no upfront cost" but on entirely different economic terms.
Headline answer
Green loan keeps ownership and tax allowance value with you (worth ~£40k lifetime on a £200k system). PPA shifts everything to the developer — including all the lifetime saving (~£400-600k). Green loan wins decisively on lifetime cost; PPA wins on operational simplicity and contract structure flexibility.
Side-by-side
| Criterion | Power Purchase Agreement | Green loan |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Developer owns; you offtake electricity | You own outright (lender holds security) |
| Upfront capex | £0 | £0 (financed) |
| Monthly cost (£200k system) | ~£2,375 PPA cost (depends on consumption) | £3,019 fixed loan repayment |
| Term | 20-25 years | 7-10 years (loan paid off) |
| After loan/PPA term | PPA may renew or system reverts to building | You own outright; full electricity savings flow to you |
| FYA capture | Developer captures | You capture (worth ~£25k year 1) |
| 25-year cumulative cash benefit | £450-650k | £999k |
| Operational responsibility | Developer (full) | You (monitoring, O&M, inverter replacement) |
| Best for | Capital-constrained or operationally-simple preference | Profitable trading companies wanting tax capture without capex |
Which one for which situation
Are you a profitable trading company that can use FYA / AIA in the period?
If yes, green loan captures the £25k year-one tax saving (and ~£12-15k of special-rate pool tail). PPA gives that to the developer. Lifetime cost gap widens by £40k+ in favour of green loan.
Can you commit to 7-10 years of property occupation and operational responsibility?
If yes (long-tenure occupier with facilities team), green loan is straightforward. If no (uncertain occupation, no in-house operational capacity), PPA shifts those obligations to the developer at the cost of lifetime saving.
Is your bank covenant or working capital position constrained?
Green loan adds debt to your balance sheet (typically 80-100% LTV, fully amortising over 7-10 years). For tight covenants, this can be problematic. PPA is off-balance-sheet always and avoids new debt — sometimes the only way to deploy solar without breaching covenants.
How much do operational simplicity and predictability matter?
PPA delivers true outsourced operation — no inverter replacement, no monitoring portal management, no O&M coordination. Green loan keeps you operating the asset. For organisations with no internal energy/facilities team, PPA simplicity may be worth the lifetime cost premium.
Power Purchase Agreement vs Green loan FAQs
Why is PPA so much more expensive than green loan over the lifetime?
Are PPA payments tax-deductible like green loan interest?
Can I switch from PPA to green loan / capital purchase later?
What if my electricity demand falls during a PPA term?
How do PPA exit clauses work in green loan refinance?
Related comparisons and finance pages
Need this comparison run on your specific numbers?
We model both structures side-by-side using your postcode, half-hourly demand profile, accounting position, and balance sheet preferences. Five working days from enquiry to indicative comparison.
Request a finance review