Capital purchase vs finance lease — UK commercial solar 2026
Capital purchase and finance lease are economically similar — both keep tax allowances with you and ownership effectively flows your way. The difference is timing of capital outlay (upfront versus monthly over 8 years) and the cost of that timing flexibility (typically £30-50k of finance charges over 8 years).
Headline answer
Capital purchase wins on lifetime cost by £30-50k over a 7-8 year horizon. Finance lease wins on capital preservation — no upfront outlay, fixed monthly cost integrated into operating budget. Choose based on whether £200k of capital is more valuable in solar (capital purchase) or held against other priorities (finance lease).
Side-by-side
| Criterion | Capital purchase | Finance lease |
|---|---|---|
| Upfront capex | £200k | £0 |
| Monthly payment | None | £2,777 over 96 months (8-year term, 7.5% APR) |
| Total payments | £200k | £266,592 over 8 years |
| Finance cost | £0 | £66,592 over 8 years (£50k after-tax) |
| FYA capture | Yes — year 1 | Yes — year 1 (lessee captures) |
| Special-rate pool | Yes — 6% writing-down | Yes — 6% writing-down |
| Asset on balance sheet | Yes (full ownership) | Yes (capitalised under FRS 102 full / IFRS 16) |
| Ownership at end of term | Always (year 0) | Lessee option to acquire at nominal value |
| 25-year cumulative | £1.05m | £986k |
| Best for | Available capital + low alternative use return | Capital preservation priority + cash flow predictability |
Which one for which situation
Is your £200k of capital more productive in solar than in your operating business?
Solar capital purchase delivers ~14-18% lifetime IRR for profitable trading companies (after-tax). If your operating business deploys capital at higher rates (16%+ post-tax), keep capital available for that and finance the solar. If operating business yields are lower, deploy capital in solar.
Do you have working capital seasonal or strategic constraints?
Lumpy capex (£200k cash outflow) can pressure working capital around year-end or strategic acquisition windows. Finance lease smooths capex into £2,777/month operating expense — easier to absorb in operating budget. Worth £30-50k of finance cost on most operating businesses to preserve flexibility.
Are your covenant ratios tight on senior debt?
Finance lease (under FRS 102 full / IFRS 16) creates a balance sheet liability similar to debt. Some loan covenants treat lease obligations as debt-equivalent. Capital purchase (paid from cash) doesn't add liabilities. For covenant-constrained operators, capital purchase may be cleaner than adding finance lease obligations.
Does your accounting framework recognise lease liabilities (IFRS 16 / FRS 102 full)?
Modern accounting frameworks (IFRS 16, FRS 102 full) recognise finance lease obligations as on-balance-sheet liabilities. Older / smaller-entity FRS 102 reporting may keep finance lease obligations off-balance-sheet, although this is becoming rare. Confirm with your accountant whether finance lease creates a recognised liability in your specific reporting framework.
Capital purchase vs Finance lease FAQs
Is the FYA tax saving the same on capital purchase and finance lease?
Can I structure a partial capital purchase + partial finance lease?
Why is finance lease typically more expensive than green loan?
Does finance lease have any advantage over green loan?
Can I terminate a finance lease early?
Related comparisons and finance pages
Need this comparison run on your specific numbers?
We model both structures side-by-side using your postcode, half-hourly demand profile, accounting position, and balance sheet preferences. Five working days from enquiry to indicative comparison.
Request a finance review